Brazos County District Attorney’s Office Reopens A Review Of A Sexual Assault That Was Reported In 2017

Screen shot from the Brazos County district attorney's Facebook page.
Screen shot from the Brazos County district attorney's Facebook page.

The Brazos County district attorney’s office has reopened its review of a sexual assault that was reported in 2017.

That’s after this month’s verdict in a civil lawsuit trial where 10 of 12 jurors awarded the victim $131 million dollars.

Click HERE to read and download the charge of the court to the jury in Brazos County district court case 22-001652-CV-472, with the name of the plaintiff and the names of the jurors removed by WTAW News.

The woman who filed the lawsuit said she was drugged and assaulted by a manager of a former bar.

D.A. Jarvis Parsons issued a statement to WTAW News that they will evaluate any new information produced during the civil trial to determine if further criminal action is warranted and legally sustainable.

Parsons said in 2017, the evidence at that time did not meet the threshold of the highest legal standard of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The D.A. added that a civil trial has a different standard of proof, and that jury’s verdict “reflects a powerful statement on accountability.”

While prosecutors revisit the sexual assault case, they are preparing for a criminal trial against the former bar manager. 37 year old David Hammond of College Station is charged with intoxication assault with a vehicle causing serious bodily injury and two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that happened in October 2020.

Statement to WTAW News from Brazos County district attorney Jarvis Parsons:

The Brazos County District Attorney’s Office is aware of the civil verdict reached involving a 2017 sexual assault allegation. We want to first acknowledge the courage of the survivor throughout this lengthy legal process and respect the decision made by the Brazos County jury.

In 2017, our office conducted a thorough review of the evidence available at that time given to us by law enforcement. Under the ethical and legal obligations of a prosecutor, we can only move forward with a case if we believe the evidence is sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt—the highest legal standard in our justice system. At that time, it was determined the evidence did not meet that threshold.

A civil trial has a different standard of proof, and this verdict reflects a powerful statement on accountability. Considering the evidence and testimony presented during the civil trial, I have directed my office to begin a formal review of the proceedings. We will evaluate any new information to determine if further criminal action is warranted and legally sustainable.

More News