<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Wants Attorneys to Settle Cemetery Prayer Dispute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wtaw.com/2011/08/23/judge-wants-attorneys-to-settle-cemetery-prayer-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wtaw.com/2011/08/23/judge-wants-attorneys-to-settle-cemetery-prayer-dispute/</link>
	<description>Newstalk Radio for the Brazos Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wtaw.com/2011/08/23/judge-wants-attorneys-to-settle-cemetery-prayer-dispute/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtaw.com/?p=28049#comment-2332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think you really cover the facts either - nor did the NYT, etc.  This should go to trial.  There are apparently distinct differences on what the &quot;facts&quot; are in this case.  These would be best worked out in a trial - with full discovery.  (i.e. govt editorial control on funeral content, closing of the chapel/conversion to a storage facility, something about missing bibles and religious symbols, gag-orders on the veteran&#039;s organizations, etc.)

I&#039;m a veteran (and an inactive member of the VFW) and not religious at all, but this needs to be worked out in court and not in the press.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you really cover the facts either &#8211; nor did the NYT, etc.  This should go to trial.  There are apparently distinct differences on what the &#8220;facts&#8221; are in this case.  These would be best worked out in a trial &#8211; with full discovery.  (i.e. govt editorial control on funeral content, closing of the chapel/conversion to a storage facility, something about missing bibles and religious symbols, gag-orders on the veteran&#8217;s organizations, etc.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a veteran (and an inactive member of the VFW) and not religious at all, but this needs to be worked out in court and not in the press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus R</title>
		<link>http://wtaw.com/2011/08/23/judge-wants-attorneys-to-settle-cemetery-prayer-dispute/#comment-2313</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtaw.com/?p=28049#comment-2313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The facts are not printed clearly here. The family of the deceased gets to decide what is said during the ceremony, per the VA rules. This is how it should be. These &#039;organizations&#039; want to ignore the will of the deceased or their family. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The facts are not printed clearly here. The family of the deceased gets to decide what is said during the ceremony, per the VA rules. This is how it should be. These &#8216;organizations&#8217; want to ignore the will of the deceased or their family. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
